”A rising economic tide is bad for people who live off of the poverty of others.” - Jonah Goldberg
Tuesday, January 16, 2018
A proposed new law in Denmark could be the first step towards an economic revolution that sees physical currencies and normal bank accounts abolished and gives governments futuristic new tools to fight the cycle of “boom and bust”.

The Danish proposal sounds innocuous enough on the surface – it would simply allow shops to refuse payments in cash and insist that customers use contactless debit cards or some other means of electronic payment.

Officially, the aim is to ease “administrative and financial burdens”, such as the cost of hiring a security service to send cash to the bank, and is part of a programme of reforms aimed at boosting growth – there is evidence that high cash usage in an economy acts as a drag.

But the move could be a key moment in the advent of “cashless societies”. And once all money exists only in bank accounts – monitored, or even directly controlled by the government – the authorities will be able to encourage us to spend more when the economy slows, or spend less when it is overheating.

Governments are migrating towards establishing a 'cashless society'? Who will hold ALL the cards should this effort become accepted on a wide-scale basis? HINT: It won't be us. Please don't take this news lightly, or simply dismiss it as improbable. Desperate times call for desperate measures. Far too many Nations around the globe have lived beyond their means for far too long -

FULL STORY

Add comment

Please check your emotions at the door, keep negative comments constructive, never personal. It's ok to include URLs here, but please stick to plain text (no HTML). It's ok to use a fake name/email address should you desire anonymity. Please note that not all comments are posted, however all are read. If you're curious as to why your material was not published, contact us and include your comment there.

Security code
Refresh

2nd Amendment

Security

Gallery of Yucks

Weekend Posts

Op Eds

Elections

Our Sources

We have been criticized for cherry-picking what we publish so to promote our own agenda. If our agenda is to spew truth, then we're guilty as charged. If you have an opposing point of view, stop reading and start writing.

Here are the top 18 of where we get our material:

Past 12 Months
4803 articles, 466 unique external references (Top 18=77%)

  • washingtontimes (988) 19%
  • wsj (929) 18%
  • washingtonpost (427 ) 8%
  • youtube (318) 6%
  • heritage (231) 4%
  • townhall (226) 4%
  • humanevents (184) 3%
  • dailycaller (173) 3%
  • politico (73) 1%
  • spectator (72) 1%
  • wikipedia (54) 1%
  • foxnews (50) <1%
  • billoreilly (43) <1%
  • nytimes (38) <1%
  • yahoo (29) <1%
  • reuters (29) <1%
  • cnn (24) <1%
  • gallup (24) <1%





Login
Register

Why Login

The most common reason: You can comment without moderation.

READ MORE

Why Register

There is no requirement to create an account here. The two reasons that exist now:

READ MORE

Writing Articles

Like to write? We're always looking for new material.

LEARN MORE

Follow Us